The End of Slavery in the Capital of a Free Nation, 150 Years Ago

By David Fiske, info@fiskeresearch.com

David Fiske is a history researcher and genealogist. He is the author of Solomon Northup: His Life Before and After Slavery.
Visit David's Web site, fiskeresearch.com
This article may be freely used, in full or excerpt form, provided attribution to David Fiske is made. It would also be greatly appreciated if a link to the URL: fiskeresearch.com is included.

Monday, April 16th is an important anniversary in the history of American liberty. It was on that date in 1862 that slavery was abolished in the District of Columbia. And it was largely due to an unlikely figure, a former shoemaker from Massachusetts. And yes, history buffs, the Civil War had been in progress for a year, meaning that slavery was still legal in the capital of the Union while it was fighting a war in which slavery was a key issue.

In May, 1836, Henry Wilson, a young shoemaker from Massachusetts was visiting the city of Washington, and took a walk to the section of the city where several slave pens were located. Seeing Williams Slave Pen (where almost five years later a kidnaped free black, named Solomon Northup, was confined) he was horrified by the conditions in which the slaves were housed. He heard their moans, and was haunted enough by them that when he returned home, he soon joined the anti-slavery movement. As time when on he entered politics, and was eventually elected as a United States Senator.

Though previous efforts had been made to eliminate slavery in the District of Columbia, it was a bill introduced by Senator Wilson late in 1861 that finally became a law. The measure, titled "an act for the release of certain persons held to service or labor in the District of Columbia," not only emancipated the slaves, but provided for compensation to owners of the slaves being freed.

The bill was debated in the Senate over the course of several days. Noah Brooks, in an 1895 book titled "Washington in Lincoln's Time," recounts that "a great many decent-looking and intelligent-appearing colored men thronged to the Senate to hear what the speakers had to say." The Senate passed it by a vote of 29 to 6.

The House of Representatives considered the bill in April, and it also passed there, 92 voting in favor and 38 against.

Having passed both houses of Congress, the bill was sent to President Abraham Lincoln. Although some pro-slavery advocates predicted he would veto it (Lincoln did express some concerns that the bill's progress was too hasty, and also had concerns relating to how the compensation amounts would be determined), Lincoln signed the bill into law on April 16, 1862.

Many slave owners had anticipated this. During the days preceding Lincoln's approval of the bill, many slaves--particularly those who would fetch the best prices at slave markets--were taken out of the District. Either owners did not want to give up their slaves, or they felt that their monetary value was higher than what they would receive as compensation under the new law.

The National Republican newspaper hoped that Lincoln would speedily sign the legislation, because "every hour [of delay] commits an additional fellow being to slavery."

One writer witnessed, at 6:00 am on the day that Lincoln signed the measure, a wagonload of slaves, mostly women, being led out of the city by a white man. "The wailing of the women will not soon be forgotten by those who heard it," he wrote.

The still-legal slave pens in Baltimore were reportedly filled with relocated servants, and the southern sections of Maryland were also destinations for slaveholders looking to beat the emancipation deadline. Some slaves were removed after the deadline. The National Republican reported as a "notorious fact" that "slaves have disappeared from here...since the bill went into effect."

Regrettably, many slaves who should have gained their freedom had their servitude extended. Most probably remained slaves until the constitutional amendment that outlawed slavery for good.

Slaves were not freed automatically. There was a process to be followed, which was handled by a commission of three men, known as the Emancipation Commission. As with any undertaking by the government, administration of the emancipation law involved procedure and paperwork. Owners were to report to the office of the Emancipation Commission in the City Hall, preferably with their slaves. The Commissioners would determine the value of each slave, and that amount would be paid to the slaveholder as compensation. Owners also had to provide evidence from two witnesses, in order to assure the commissioners that they had title to the slaves they claimed to own, and also to testify to the owners' loyalty to the Union (rebel owners were not to be compensated).

If the slaves could not be brought before the Commission (some black men, for example, had already hooked up with the Union Army and were not available for evaluation), the value of the slaves could be asserted by additional evidence from witnesses.

The process was involved enough that attorney John M. Binckley placed ads in Washington papers offering, at moderate fees, his services in drawing up and presenting applications to "Loyal Owners" seeking "Compensation for Freed Slaves."

In the end, former slaves were given certificates of freedom, and owners received checks.

Noah Brooks described the crowd of former slave owners as they lined up, in January 1863, to get their payments.

He witnessed some 300 claimants lined up at the Treasury Department. Each would give his name to a clerk, who would look up the person's claim number. A cashier would find the check with the corresponding number, have the claimant sign a receipt and hand over the check. Next the check was taken to the U. S. Treasurer, another signature was requested, and the check was approved to be paid out by the Sub-Treasury. In this lackluster way, the vestiges of slavery disappeared from our nation's capital.

Several days were spent processing claims in this manner. In the end, the amount of compensation paid out was less than the one-million dollars that Congress had appropriated for that purpose. No doubt the expense of compensation would have been more, had not so many able-bodied slaves been spirited out of the city just before (or after) the law had taken effect. The National Republican had claimed that by the time the law went into effect the majority of slaves in the District were "old and decrepid [sic], and...in a slave market would be deemed 'worthless stock.'"

Newspaper clips above were located via the Library of Congress's Chronicling America collection. chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/ or from genealogybank.com

Home Page